August 2005

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      

« Spain Researchers Concerned About Lack of Funds | Main | India to Create and Publish Biotech Policy in January 2005 »

October 26, 2004

Comments

Jeff Donohue

Having sat through the horrors of that Michael Keaton movie, I, for one, wholeheartedly agree with a complete ban on human cloning.

Humor (or attempt at) aside, I have to say that I'm at a loss here. There is a repeated statement that the creation of human clones is a horror, but I have yet to hear a cogent explanation as to why. In vitro fertilization is not a horror. Neither are twins. What is the fundamental difference between cloning and in vitro fertilization (admittedly on a delayed basis) of your twin? The parade of horribles ("we'll make clones for the spare parts!") is defeated with the simple realization that a clone would be a person, and entitled to all the rights and protections of a person. With remarkably few exceptions, we don't make people for the spare parts, do we?

Could someone explain why cloning is so horrible?


-- These statements are my own and not those of my employer, a really nice biotech firm that has nothing to do with cloning. --

The comments to this entry are closed.